U.S. government has ordered a sweeping review of green‑card holders from what it calls “countries of concern.” On Nov. 27, 2025, USCIS Director Joseph Edlow — acting under direction from Donald J. Trump — announced a “full‑scale, rigorous re‑examination” of every green card issued to immigrants from 19 flagged countries.
These countries include Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, Libya, Venezuela, Yemen, Sudan, and others previously designated by the administration as posing higher security concerns. The re‑examination mandate broadly affects lawful permanent residents in the U.S. who originated from those countries — not only recent arrivals but also individuals who have held green cards for some time.
The move comes after authorities arrested the suspected shooter: a 29‑year‑old Afghan national admitted under a 2021 resettlement program. In response, the administration also halted all immigration processing for Afghan nationals indefinitely.
Officials say the review aims to determine whether any lawful permanent residents from the flagged countries pose a security risk. USCIS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have begun scrutinizing prior vetting procedures, re‑checking background data, and coordinating with intelligence and law‑enforcement agencies to identify possible threats.
As part of the directive, USCIS will also temporarily pause certain types of immigration processing and applications linked to the flagged countries — a review that may delay or block renewals, adjustments, or other immigration benefits while the re‑examination is underway.
The sweeping nature of the review — covering hundreds of thousands of green card holders — has sparked concern among immigrant communities, civil‑rights groups, and legal advocates. Critics argue it amounts to collective suspicion based on nationality, undermining due process and potentially violating legal protections for lawful residents. Meanwhile, supporters of the policy argue it is a necessary national‑security measure in light of the recent attack.
Why It Matters
-
The review signals a major shift in U.S. immigration policy — one where lawful permanent‑residency status may no longer guarantee stability, especially for immigrants from designated “countries of concern.”
-
It raises serious concerns over fairness, due process, and potential stigmatization of entire immigrant communities — many of whom have lived in the U.S. for years under green‑card status.
-
The decision may affect hundreds of thousands (or more) of immigrants — potentially leading to increased background checks, delays in renewals, or even revocations of lawful‑permanent‑resident status.
-
It could reshape the social climate around immigration and refugees, possibly increasing fear, distrust, and marginalization among immigrant communities.
-
The review puts pressure on existing immigrant‑integration efforts, legal‑aid networks, and immigrant‑rights advocacy groups, who may need to brace for a wave of uncertain legal outcomes, administrative friction, or public backlash.
Key Social Outcomes
-
Heightened anxiety and uncertainty among lawful‑permanent residents from targeted countries — many may worry their legal status is under review, even if they committed no wrongdoing.
-
Community polarization and fear: Immigrant communities — especially from flagged countries — may feel increasingly vulnerable, marginalized, or unwelcome, potentially undermining trust in government institutions.
-
Increased demand on legal and social‑service systems: Many residents may seek legal advice, status verification, or community support, creating pressure on civil‑society organizations, bar associations, and support networks.
-
Broader societal discourse on immigration and national security: The review may reignite debates about refugee programs, vetting standards, and the balance between security and civil‑liberties protections.
-
Potential chilling effect on immigration: The re‑examination may deter prospective immigrants or refugees — especially from flagged countries — from seeking permanent residency, fearing instability or future review.
