America has a distinctive employment system compared to most other wealthy nations, especially regarding job security, and the rise of AI may make that difference even more pronounced. The article argues that what makes the U.S. “exceptional” — in a way that often disadvantages workers — includes the prevalence of at-will employment, weak labor protections, low unionization, and a comparatively limited welfare safety net.
In many other rich countries—particularly parts of Europe—workers are more likely to enjoy stronger protections against dismissal, more robust unemployment benefits, more generous sick leave, paid leave policies, and higher union membership. These buffers help dampen the fear of job loss. In contrast, in the U.S., the ability of employers to terminate employment at will, combined with relatively modest safety nets, has made job insecurity a longstanding concern.
Since the late 1970s and more sharply in recent decades, the U.S. has seen a decline in union power, regulatory rollback, and weakening of welfare-state structures. Inflation-adjusted wages have largely stagnated for many, while income inequality has steadily increased.
AI technologies are now joining this mix, with potential to magnify job insecurity in several ways. The article distinguishes three types of AI:
-
Predictive AI (recommending content, anticipating trends)
-
Generative AI (producing content, writing, image/video generation)
-
Agentic AI (systems that plan and act more autonomously)
Generative AI is already outperforming humans in tasks like visual reasoning and competitive math / science questions, according to Stanford’s 2025 AI Index. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has warned that generative AI will impact many industries.
Agentic AI, still emerging, promises larger disruption — for example, roles in customer service or routine administrative/travel/HR work may be automated. The article suggests that when such AI is combined with America’s weak job protections, the risk grows that displacement or layoffs will be more frequent, and that job insecurity may become more deeply entrenched.
Polling shows that about one third of U.S. workers believe AI will negatively affect their work or job opportunities. Business leaders also expect job losses in service industries, supply chains, and HR over the next few years.
Overall, the combination of U.S.‐style employment norms + rapid AI adoption = a possible “perfect storm” for increased worker anxiety, displacement risk, and weaker fallback options compared to many peer countries. Without policy changes, job insecurity may become normalized.
Why It Matters
-
Worsening inequality & stagnant wages
If AI displaces jobs without strong protections, the gap between high-skill/high-wage workers and others may widen further. -
Economic and social vulnerability
Workers in sectors with weaker protections (service, HR, admin, retail) may face financial precarity, without robust safety nets. -
Psychological impact & workforce behavior
Job insecurity weighs on mental health; it may reduce risk-taking, discourage career transitions, retraining, or entrepreneurship. -
Competitive disadvantage vs. peer nations
Countries with stronger labor protections may be better able to manage the transition, preserve employment, and ensure stability. -
Policy urgency for labor reform
To prevent worse outcomes, there is a need for updated labor laws, AI regulation, retraining programs, possibly changes to at-will employment doctrine or unemployment benefits.
Key Social Outcomes
-
Increased worker anxiety and mental health stress
As job loss or displacement risk becomes more visible, more workers may experience anxiety, insecurity, and stress disorders. -
Reduced job mobility
Fearing risk, workers may stay in jobs even if they are unsatisfying or low paying, discouraging transitions to better opportunities, innovation, or retraining. -
Shift in employer-employee power balance
Employers may feel more entitled to use AI to cut staff without accountability; workers may feel disempowered and unable to negotiate protections. -
Erosion of trust in institutions
If workers see that policies, social safety nets, or government protections are weak when it comes to AI impacts, faith in institutions (government, unions) may decline. -
Social polarization and political pressure
Job insecurity tends to increase populism, political division; there could be pressure for new political movements, regulation, or backlash against tech employers or policymakers.
Publication & Link
- Originally published August 26, 2025, via The Conversation (republished in TechXplore) — “The US really is unlike other rich countries when it comes to job insecurity – and AI could make it even more ‘exceptional’” by Jeffrey C. Dixon. Tech Xplore
- Live link: TechXplore version Tech Xplore
